JMR UK Consultancy Ltd

Archive for April, 2012

Post Implementation Review Part Four

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

Post Implementation Review – Lessons Learned

Project Post Implementation ReviewThe last blog post looked at the project post implementation review process and how well requirements were satisfied. Here we deal with how to approach the lessons learned for a post implementation review. When identifying lessons learned, the goal should be to identify what went well, what didn’t go well, and why. At this point, you might be thinking that spending time on a post implementation review, when the next project is around the corner, is difficult to justify or convince our team that you should be doing it at all. To many people, a project post implementation review sounds like a lot of bureaucratic overhead when there are more things to do. Once the project’s finished, we’re hoping to focus our attention on something else! However, lessons learned are findings that could be useful as input to future projects and should form part of the organisations learning process.

Post Implementation Review Discovery Process:

Post Implementation Review Hard MeasuresMany of the items in the previous two blog posts can also double as lessons learned. They are particularly useful, because they offer hard measures of success or failure. Our approach involves gathering information that is often more subjective and unanticipated. It can be equally valuable and often more broadly applicable to future projects. It is important to conduct a formal lessons learned exercise with the project team, sponsors, and stakeholders. The main steps to conduct a lessons learned exercise as a fundamental part of the project post implementation review are:

  • Be objective,look for hard measures and facts,make judgments on that basis
  • Capture positive as well as negative lessons
  • Focus on the future and not on blame for shortfalls
  • Conduct a customer survey to capture information where you need statistical relevance
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the project management practices
  • Focus on events and issues that were “unknowns” early in the project life-cycle
  • Be sure enough time has passed to draw conclusions

Capture the most salient points for inclusion in the Post Implementation Review (PIR). It is important to solicit feedback from a diverse audience within each subgroup you gain input from. Make sure you structure the review process so that everyone in the organisation has an opportunity to review finding that may be relevant to their work.

Post Implementation Review Reporting Process

project post implementation review and lessons learnedAttach appropriate documentation, which may a useful addition to the PIR such as a final Quality Assurance Report, customer survey results, etc. Add to your organisation’s repository of best practices where you have something new to contribute. Document specific and unique practices and procedures that led to project successes and make recommendations for applying them to similar future projects. Provide only the level of detail necessary to offer a meaningful analysis of events and conclusions. Ensure the PIR is recorded and accessible to anyone who may benefit from it in the future.

project post implementation reivew from JMR Consulting UK LtdThe value of conducting a formal lessons learned section as part of the post implementation review is helping future projects, so they will experience fewer problems and setbacks. You don’t need to wait until the entire project finishes. You could capture lessons learned incrementally throughout the project, or at least very soon after it’s over, while the issues are still fresh. In conclusion, by capturing lessons learned and turning it into project foresight, you will achieve far greater long-term success than by blissfully ignoring or forgetting problems, or by simply moving on when a project ends.

JMR Consulting UK Ltd has core project management expertise based on its Financial Services heritage and 15 years of operating in the Finance and IT sectors. Over this period, JMR staff have developed key project management programs and a constant focus on our service philosophy which is at the core of JMR’s business operation.

Post Implementation Review Part Three

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

Post Implementation Review – Requirements Satisfaction

Project Post Implementation ReviewThe last blog post looked at the need to conduct an analysis of corrective actions that can be taken to refine the operation of the system with experience in the live environment with the new system and business process. Once the system has been in place for a long enough period, the post implementation review team is able to judge the actual impact on the organisation.

The next two steps of the post implementation review are to cover off three major issues:

  • How well do the results match the requirements?
  • How well do the results match the expectations of stakeholders?
  • Are there gaps in the requirements that should be reviewed?

Using a comprehensive approach to reviewing the results allows you to judge the technical success of the project, recognise gaps in requirements gathering that need to be addressed in future projects, and the project’s real impact on the organisation. As in previous blog post we will break this step down into two process – the discovery process and the reporting process.

Post Implementation Review Discovery Process

It is important to conduct the Post Implementation Review after the project’s deliverables have Project Risk Reviews from JMR Consulting UK Ltdbeen in service for an adequate period of time so that the team can evaluate the product or service’s successful integration into the business. The starting point here should be to review the project charter to evaluate how closely the project results match the original goals, objectives, and deliverables. This stage of the post implementation review process should look at the following areas of interest:

  • Perform a gap analysis between planned versus delivered requirements
  • Document schedule variances, their timing and causes affecting interim deliverables and the project end date schedule
  • Document budget variances, their timing and causes affecting interim deliverables and the project end date schedule
  • Are the level and number of faults identified acceptable?
  • Are adequate system controls in place and could they be improved to reduce future risk?
  • Is data integrity being maintained within the system and in relation to integrated or interfaced systems?
  • Does the system process transactions at an adequate speed?
  • Are staff members following critical, supportive operational procedures
  • Has the system demonstrated an ability to handle peak loads expected mid or long-term?
  • Have appropriate project close-out activities been completed?
  • How does the actual operating cost of the system compare with what was anticipated?

Post Implementation Review Reporting Process

The main item to bring out in the reporting process is to ensure users of the system are satisfied with its performance and capabilities and to the degree they find it easy to use and better than the system and process that it replaced. Ensure that any findings and recommendations are reported with an eye toward causes (not blame, but a description of influential factors). Report findings to both project sponsors and current system owners

post implementation review is key to projectsJMR Consulting UK Ltd has core project management expertise based on its Financial Services heritage and 15 years of operating in the Finance and IT sectors. Over this period, JMR staff have developed key project management programs and a constant focus on our service philosophy which is at the core of JMR’s business operation.

Post Implementation Review Part Two

Sunday, April 15th, 2012

Post Implementation Review Next Steps

JMR Consulting UK Ltd will help you manage your post implementation reviewIn the last blog post we outlined the purpose of a Post Implementation Review and discussed that the desired outcome of a post implementation review is to analyse, evaluate and rate how successfully the project objectives have been met and how effective the project management controls have been. The best time to undertake a post implementation review is after the system has been live long enough to allow for judgments to be made about how it will perform long-term in the live environment.

The results of the Post Implementation Review should be documented in a project close-out report called the Post Implementation Review Report which should look back at the project but also be a forward looking report to try and identify further benefits that can be harvested from the system in the operational environment.

Post Implementation Review Report and Corrective Actions

One of the first considerations should be an analysis of any corrective actions that can be taken to further refine the operation of the system in the light of operational experience in the live environment. Once the new system and business process are in place, there may be opportunities for further refinement of the system, businesses processes or other environmental factors that could result in increased business benefits. It is important not to limit your recommendations just to the original scope of the project, but take the opportunity to re-evaluate the system and its operating environment and report on any further potential business improvements.

Post Implementation Review Discovery Process

Every project is different and all project post implementation reviews should be specific to the project.  The type of areas that can be looked at should include, but not be limited to, some of the following areas of interest

  • Could more training improve the level of benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs?
  • Can we improve benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs through system changes?
  • Could changes in business process improve benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs?
  • Any additional documentation to improve benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs?
  • Changes to policies or procedures improve benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs?
  • Any additional support to improve benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs?
  • Could changes in staffing improve benefits delivered or reduce ongoing costs?
  • Are staffing levels and skill sets appropriate to the workload?
  • Can corrective actions, process and system fixes, be handled at an adequate pace?
  • Is the system structured and staffed for future flexibility?

Post Implementation Review Reporting Process

When drawing up and presenting the final report, it is important to make sure that you report any findings and recommendations with cost and future savings implications. Also ensure that you report recommendations to both project sponsors and current system owners.

Post Implementation Review Services from JMR Consulting UK LtdJMR Consulting UK Ltd has core project management expertise based on its Financial Services heritage and 15 years of operating in the Finance and IT sectors. Over this period, JMR staff have developed key project management programs and a constant focus on our service philosophy which is at the core of JMR’s business operation.

Post Implementation Review Part One

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

Post Implementation Review (PIR) Part One

Post Implementation ReviewThis is the first in a series of blog posts on the tricky subject of Project Post Implementation Reviews. The purpose of a Post Implementation Review is to analyse, evaluate and rate how successfully the project objectives were met and how effective project management practices were. It is a key project process in the “lessons learned” process for any organisation that wants to learn from its successful projects and those projects that have been less successful. Normally, the Post Implementation Review (PIR) on a project is conducted after completion of the project, but before making any final improvements. Ideally, the project post implementation review should happen after the system has been live long enough to allow for judgments to be made about how it will perform long-term in the live environment. The results of the Post Implementation Review should be documented in a close-out report called the Post Implementation Review Report.

Post Implementation Review and Lessons Learned

Once a project has gone live and you have experience of running the project in an operationalJMR Consulting UK Ltd sphere environment, conducting a timely and thorough Post Implementation Review will help identify lessons learned and previously unidentified shortfalls in the project. These findings will assist in making final improvements to the system being implemented and are useful pointers for improvements to project management practices for future projects. A thorough Post Implementation Review will identify lessons learned that will also assist in planning, managing and meeting the objectives of future projects. We will include some suggestions on how best to conduct a post implementation review in subsequent blog posts. Every project is different and whilst these post implementation review pointers are meant to be fairly comprehensive they can be adapted or altered to suit your needs, the risk profile of your project or the scale of the project.

Post Implementation Review – Focus on the project results

So in terms of project results, you want to be sure that you use the project implementation review process and results to improve the future performance of projects and individuals in the organisation:

  • Understand the technical success the project
  • Has it satisfied all requirements and the project’s main goals
  • Judge the business benefits delivered
  • Has the intent of sponsors and stakeholders been delivered
  • Collect a list of  lessons learned

Post Implementation Review – Who should be involved?

Depending on the size, risk profile and cost etc, you can take different approaches to conducting a post implementation review. On very large and risky projects, we have seen an approach that involves two teams undertaking the review independently. In this approach you can allocate an internal team to drive one version of the post implementation review and an independent team to drive another version of it. The internal team normally has a deep understanding of the project and will uncover insider issues that are technically complex because they have been very close to the project. An independent/audit team can be more objective and will pick up on issues that the project team may have dismissed as a group because they have been very close to the running and delivery of the project. We have also run post implementation reviews in a combined workshop format. The main important aspect is to make sure that you get input from the:

  • entire project team,
  • customers (system owners)
  • and other major stakeholders

Post Implementation Review and MR Consulting UK LtdJMR Consulting UK Ltd has core project management expertise based on its Financial Services heritage and 15 years of operating in the Finance and IT sectors. Over this period, JMR staff have developed key project management programs and a constant focus on our service philosophy which is at the core of JMR’s business operation. If we can help you with your business or project problem then give us a call on +44 (0) 845 052 0900.

Project Risk Management Can be Scary

Monday, April 2nd, 2012

Project Risk Management and How to Make it Less Scary

Project Risk ManagementIn our previous blog post we discussed an outline of a Project Risk Review process that will guide you through the main areas that your project risk review should cover. So let’s look at one aspect in particular – project risk management. You’ve just started a new project, and are feeling confident and excited about the road ahead. As a project manager, you’re busy planning timelines, allocating resources, budgets etc and dreaming up ways to make your project really successful. But don’t forget project risk management because it needs your attention. While it can be unpleasant to even entertain the idea of project risks, it’s vital to do so for the life of your project. Project risk management looks at the whole lifecycle management of threats for projects.

First of all – What’s a risk? Well in project terms, a risk is an issue that has yet to happen, but it might. Risks arise in projects because projects usually possess uncertainty. It’s important to consider project risk management so that you have a plan and can resolve any project issues that may occur. In the past, however, some traditional approaches to risk management have been met with problems. For instance, sometimes project teams come up with invalid or unrealistic risk scenarios. In addition, some risk response plans rarely even get executed so a new approach is required and we call this proactive project risk management.

What is Proactive Project Risk Management

Proactive Project Risk Management Hits the TargetProactive project risk management is a more powerful and valuable approach to managing risks on projects. We define proactive project risk management as a combination of attitude and approach because the successful Project Manager takes project risk management very seriously in order to protect their own their personal bandwidth and the bandwidth of the project for when the big risk hits.  Just like insurance, the project is paying upfront to safeguard the ability to identify and address the big risks, resulting in protecting value throughout the project.

Proactive Project Risk Management starts with a plan

The first thing a successful Project Manager needs is a Project Risk Management Plan. This plan outlines how risks will be managed throughout the life of a project. The Risk Management Plan should include:

  • The basics of the Process, how risks will be identified and assessed,
  • How risks will be monitored and communicated, and
  • How time and cost contingencies will be calculated and included in the project schedule and budget.

The Plan will need to be signed off by the project sponsor, the project leads, and possibly the project Steering Committee, if applicable. This signifies that the successful Project Manager has the support of the primary stakeholders to manage those risks and prepare for the unknown.

Project Risk Management needs to be Proactive

It is important to adopt a proactive project risk management approach and is a key process that leads to successful projects. Because all projects will be challenged at some point, Proactive Project Risk Management will enable the successful Project Manager to deal with the big, unforeseen issues that inevitably will arrive and knock the project off course. Start by focusing on the management of specific, realistic, and actionable risks. Also make sure you measure the effectiveness of these risks at the end of each project.

Project risk management is not something that just occurs at the start of your project – you’ve got to make sure you keep your eye is on it during the whole project lifecycle. The benefits of project risk management run high. Perhaps most importantly, proactive project risk management will result in a better rate of return on the overall project portfolio and there is also an improved project predictability.

JMR Consulting UK Ltd can Help with your Project Risk Management challenges

Project Risk Management Services from JMR Consulting UK LtdJMR Consulting UK Ltd has core project management expertise based on its Financial Services heritage and 15 years of operating in the Finance and IT sectors. Over this period, JMR staff have developed key project management programs and a constant focus on our service philosophy which is at the core of JMR’s business operation.